Imteyazul Ansari @ Gonaur Ansari @ Intajul Ansari @ Gonaur v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./8653/2026 · 2026-02-23
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8619 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8619 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8653 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ======================================================
1. Imteyazul Ansari @ Gonaur Ansari @ Intajul Ansari @ Gonaur Son of Samsul Ansari @ Shamshul Ansari Resident of village- Haruhani, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran. 2. Imteyazul Haque @ Bhola Ansari @ Bhola @ Inhajul Haque @ Inajul Ansari @ Inhajul Ansari Son of Late Rafique Ansari Resident of village- Haruhani, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran. 3. Sahanaz Khatoon @ Shahnaj Begam wife of Imteyazul Ansari @ Intehajul Ansari Resident of village- Haruhani, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109, 74, 125, 329(4), 303(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, on 23.07.2024 at about 10:30 AM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, armed with lathi, fatha, iron rod and country made pistol, surrounded son of informant and co-accused Kalam
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8653 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 Ansari, Eklakhur Rahman Ansari, Ajim Ansari, Asfak Ansari and Aslam Ansari assaulted him due to which he received injuries and fell down on the ground. When informant and her family members went to save him, all the named accused persons assaulted them due to which they also sustained multiple injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons also outraged the modesty of female members of the family and looted ornaments worth Rs. 2,00,000/-. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are neighbors and due to petty dispute, maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8653 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 312 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T