[2026:RJ-JP:22933] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1449/2026 Omprakash @ Omi S/o Dharmsingh, Age 25 Years, R/o Deeppura, Police Station Sadar, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1975/2026 Shivraj S/o Shri Ramesh, Aged about 19 Years, Resident Of Deeppura, Police Station Sadar Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishan Sharma Mr. Rahul Sharma Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 04/06/2026 1. These instant bail application have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.290/2025 registered at Police Station Karauli, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 316(2) of BNS and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act. [2026:RJ-JP:22933] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1449/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against accused- petitioners; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that there is one criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner Omprakash @ Omi. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the material made available before this Court and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 27.12.2025; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners have been filed; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Omprakash @ Omi S/o Dharmsingh and Shivraj S/o Shri Ramesh are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial [2026:RJ-JP:22933] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1449/2026] Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 9-10/EKTA