Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8609 (KAR)

SRI PRAKASH RAJ v. M/S SREE GOKULAM CHITS AND FINANCE

CRL.RP/190/2018 · 2026-03-04

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13449 CRL.RP No. 190 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.190 OF 2018 BETWEEN: SRI PRAKASH RAJ S/O LATE VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT No.13/1, 9TH CROSS, TEMPLE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU – 560 003 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.B. SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S SREE GOKULAM CHITS AND FINANCE COMPANY PVT LTD, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.66, ARCOT ROAD, KODAMBAKAM CHENNAI – 600 024 AND HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT No.240, SAMPIGE ROAD, 16TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 003 REPT. BY ITS LEGAL CLERK SRI RAJA S/O MAHADEVA H M AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SURESH CHOTTEYANDA S, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.01.2018 IN CRL.A.No.294/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE LII Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13449 CRL.RP No. 190 of 2018 ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE AS BEING NOT SUSTAINABLE, ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND CONTRARY TO THE FACTS OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo, which reads as under: “The appellant in the above case withdraw the present revision petition and kindly liberty may be granted to file Criminal Appeal before this Court. Hence, accepted the memo and kindly taken on record.” 2. Placing the memo on record petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. Time spent before this court in this revision shall be excluded while computing the period of limitation in the intended appeal. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order after keeping the photocopy. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13449 CRL.RP No. 190 of 2018 Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64