[2026:RJ-JP:22791] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4686/2026 Faijan S/o Abdulla, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Rundh Khoh, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5205/2026 Ajru @ Ajruddin S/o Almu @ Almuddin, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kathol, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 01/06/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 35/2026 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS & Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that [2026:RJ-JP:22791] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4686/2026] charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long; that trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications and submits that there is one another criminal antecedent registered against accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 03.02.2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Faijan S/o Abdulla and Ajru @ Ajruddin S/o Almu @ Almuddin are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. [2026:RJ-JP:22791] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4686/2026] 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 84-85