Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33873 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.15 of 2026, under Sections-109(1), 115(2), 351(3), 326(g) B.N.S., Police Station-Sajeti, District Kanpur Nagar, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that present FIR has been lodged against the applicant as well entire family members of the applicant only to harass him in society on the basis of mala fide intention at local level. After investigation, charge sheet has been filed. There is contradiction in the version of FIR and the statement of the injured. The injuries are simple in nature. There is no criminal history against the applicant. It is next submitted that the co-accused Seepu has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 09.06.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.17789 of 2026. The applicant's case is identical to the co-accused and he is also entitled to bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 07.02.2026. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Nath Chaubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed. 6. Let the applicant - Deepu involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions: (i).
The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii). The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii). The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv). The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (v). The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. September 23, 2026 S.K.
BAIL No. 33873 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad