[2026:RJ-JP:22981] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4653/2026 Islup S/o Ishak, Age 31 Year, R/o Saimla Khurd, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4950/2026 1. Shorab S/o Pehalwan, Age 25 Years, R/o Kaithwada, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). 2. Talim S/o Hussain Khan, Age 24 Years, R/o Kaithwada, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5513/2026 1. Sakir S/o Rustom, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kaithwara, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (The Accused Petitioner Is Currently Confined At Sub Jail Deeg Since 01.03.2026) 2. Salman S/o Sabir, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Khadriwas, Kaithwara, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (The Accused Petitioner Is Currently Confined At Sub Jail Deeg Since 01.03.2026) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain, [2026:RJ-JP:22981] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-4653/2026] Mr. Anuj Rohila, Mr. Rahul Agrawal Mr. Rakesh Trivedi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 05/06/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 26/2026 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of some applications found installed in their mobile phones, which are capable of being used in the commission of cyber fraud. They also submit that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long. They further submit that charge-sheet has already been filed and there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners. It is further submitted that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, pray that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. [2026:RJ-JP:22981] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-4653/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsels for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioners. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the arguments advanced by learned counsels for both the parties and the material made available before this Court in the form of copy of charge-sheet; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 01.03.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners has been filed; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (1) Islup S/o Ishak, (2) Shorab S/o Pehalwan, (3) Talim S/o Hussain Khan, (4) Sakir S/o Rustom & (5) Salman S/o Sabir are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. [2026:RJ-JP:22981] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-4653/2026] 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J PUNEET KUMAR/49-51