Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8592 (ALL)

SANT PRASAD DUBEY v. MADHURI

A227/4993/2026 · 2026-09-22

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4993 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is contended that petitioner was married to respondent according to Hindu rites and customs on 08.07.2008. From the aforesaid wedlock, three children were born, two are girls child and one is male child. One male child and one girl child are living with petitioner, while one girl child is living with respondent-wife. 3. A divorce petition was filed by the petitioner in which an application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act was filed by respondent-wife seeking maintenance pendente lite. By the order dated 04.03.2025, Court below had awarded lump sum litigation expenses of Rs.5,000/-, and also directed the petitioner to pay Rs.4,000/- per month as an interim maintenance to respondent-wife. Against the said order, a recall application was moved by the petitioner, which has been rejected by the order impugned dated 12.03.2026. 4. After going through orders dated 12.03.2026 and 04.03.2025, no case for interference is made out, as meager lump sum amount of Rs.5,000/- has been awarded as litigation expenses and Rs.4,000/- as interim maintenance. 5. Writ petition stands dismissed. September 23, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikey Dubey, Man Mohan Mishra, Prem Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sant Prasad Dubey .....Petitioner(s) Madhuri .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad