MANSUR ANSARI ALIAS MANSUR MIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./637/2026 · 2026-02-05
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8587 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8587 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:3018 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 637 of 2026
1. Mansur Ansari @ Mansur Miyan, aged about 48 years, son of Idrish Miyan
2. Kamruddin Ansari, aged about 44 years, son of Idrish Ansari @ Md. Idrish
3. Mustafa Ansari @ Md. Mustafa Ansari, aged about 24 years, son of Md. Kalim Ansari
4. Hussaini Ansari @ Md. Hussain, aged about 55 years, son of Mehandi Mian
5. Kallu Miyan @ Md. Muzib Ansari @ Md. Muzib, aged about 36 years, son of Ahmad Miyan All residents of village Khariyodih, P.O. Ghoranjee, P.S. Deori, District- Giridih (Jharkhand) ...... … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners
:Mr. Sudhir Kumar Roy, Advocate
Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, A.P.P
06/ 05.02.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bengabdad P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 140(3), 304(2), 3(5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners and informant are relatives. He further submits that daughter of the petitioner no. 1 lodged a case against the informant and his family members being Bengabad P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024 under sections 127(2), 115(2), 85, 351, 3(5) of BNS and section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and in retaliation complaint case has been filed against the petitioners which has been converted into F.I.R. later on by the order of the learned Court and even no injury is there upon the body of the informant. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory
( 2026:JHHC:3018 )
bail.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of forcibly taking away the informant by the petitioners.
5.
Considering that earlier the daughter of the petitioner no. 1 lodged a case against the informant and his family members being Bengabad P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024 and thereafter the informant has lodged the present case and further injury is not there on the body of the informant, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Giridih, in connection with Bengabdad P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023.
Dt.05.02.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-