1 2026:CGHC:14439 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1875 of 2026 1. Churaman Das S/o Shri Hari Krishna Shrivastava Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No. 21, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Ward, Chhota Bazar, Post And Police Station - Chirimiri District Korea Chhattisgarh Presently Working As Member, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Korea, District Korea Chhattisgarh 2. Girish Shrivastava S/o Shri Hari Krishna Shrivastava Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Baghbahara, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh Presently Working As Member, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3. Smt. T. Durga Jyoti Rao W/o Late T. Prakash Rao Aged About 59 Years R/o Ward No. 09, Chipiya Para, Tehsil - Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh Presently Working As Member, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 4. Smt. Neetu Thakur W/o Late Shri Hemant Thakur Aged About 62 Years R/o House No. 1042, Near Krishna Public School, Sindhiya Nagar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh, Presently Working As Member, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.03.25 19:06:51 +0530 2 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Secretary Department Of Law And Legislative Work, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Registrar Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. BP Singh and Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocates For Respondents : Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Additional Advocate General S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 25/03/2026 1. At the outset, learned Additional Advocate General submits that tenure of the Members of District Consumers Redressal Forum is extended till 31.7.2026 in the light of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 21.5.2025 in SLP (C) No.9982/2024, a copy of which is also placed on record for perusal of this Court. 2. After going through the aforementioned order, learned counsel for petitioners submits that period has been extended only upto 31.7.2026 and not till fresh appointments are made. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the rules are formulated by the Central Government and based on the 3 rules, fresh proceeding for appointment of the Members is to be initiated. He submits that if rules are not published before 31.7.2026 and fresh appointment are not made, then further appropriate orders will be passed. 4. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, in the opinion of this Court, nothing remains in this petition for adjudication at this stage in view of the relief sought for. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-