Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8587 (ALL)

ABHINAY YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15548/2026 · 2026-09-23

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15548 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nagendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to renew the petitioner's contract/services of Part Time Instructor and permit him to discharge his duties as Part Time Instructor (Health and Physical Education) at Upper Primary School Bhojpur, Block-Gunnaur, District Sambhal in pursuant of contract order dated 20.06.2013 issued by respondent no.2 and further to pay the monthly honorarium in accordance with law. (ii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent no.2 to take an appropriate decision in furtherance of petitioner's pending representation dated 24.08.2026 forthwith." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been working as a Part Time Instructor since 2013. Having met with an accident, he could not attend his duty after 19.10.2024. In this regard, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 26.12.2024, to which he submitted a reply on 08.01.2025, but no decision has been taken so far. Therefore, it is prayed that a direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to pass an appropriate order, after considering the petitioner's reply, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Chandra Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nagendra Kumar Pandey Abhinay Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. In view of above, the writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2, District Basic Education Officer, District-Sambhal, to decide the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate order on the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, by means of passing a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2026 Rahul. WRIA No. 15548 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad