Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8586 (GAU)

MR SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/7048/2025 · 2026-06-18

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010263942025 2026:GAU-AS:8906 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7048/2025 MR SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND ANR S/O- LATE RAM KRISHNA MISHRA, R/O- VILL- ERAGAON, P.O. MORIGAON, P.S. MORIGAON, PIN- 782105, DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM 2: ALOKESHI GOSWAMI W/O- MR. SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA R/O- VILL- ERAGAON P.O.- MORIGAON P.S. MORIGAON PIN- 782105 DIST.- MORIGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DISTRICT ASSAM PIN- 782015 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MORIGAON DISTRICT ASSAM PIN- 782015 4:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE MORIGAON POLICE THANNA MORIGAON DISTRICT PIN- 782015 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE EDITOR/PROPRIETOR TIMES GUWAHATI (WEB NEWS PORTAL) ULUBARI G.S.ROAD GUWAHATI-7 ASSA For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. I. S. Mazumdar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M. Barman, Govt. Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 19.06.2026 Heard Mr. I. S. Mazumdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners. Ms. M. Barman, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners have been defamed by the Respondent No.5 in a programme published in the web news portal of “Times Guwahati”. 3. It is the opinion of this Court that the instant dispute is primarily a dispute which is of civil nature, and under such circumstances, the Petitioners would be well advised to approach the appropriate Civil Court in this regard. Page No.# 3/3 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition without prejudice to avail remedies before the competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction. 5. Consequently, this Court closes the instant writ petition on withdrawal. 6. However, liberty is given to the Petitioners to approach the competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction and the withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not preclude or prejudice the Petitioners. JUDGE Comparing Assistant