SRI KADIMI TRIMURTHULU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/24416/2026 · 2026-08-24
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8581 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8581 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026
APHC010450202026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24416/2026 Between:
1. SRI KADIMI TRIMURTHULU, S/O. K.VEERABBAI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF 4-1-84/2, PEEDA KALAVA GATTU, VEERABADRAPURAM,
MANDAPETA, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533308
2. SMT. CHINNIADILAKSHMI, W/O. LATE CHINNI SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCBUSINESS, RESIDENT OF 4-1-84/2, PEEDA KALAVA GATTU, VEERABADRAPURAM, MANDAPETA, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533308
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (M) DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, AMRAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH.-522239
2. THE MANDAPETA MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TOWN-HALL ROAD, MANDAPETA, KAKINADA/EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.-533308
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R B KAKINADA. KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533003
4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MANDAPETA, KAKINADA/EAST GODAVRI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533308
2 HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of the official of the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in interfering and threatening to demolish the shop belonging to the Petitioners situated beside Bus stop bearing (old 34-19-4) situated
at Peeda Kalava Gattu, Veerabadrapuram, Mandapeta, Kakinada/East Godavari District, Andhra ,Pradesh, without issuing any notice as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, violative of the principles of natural justice, violative of fundamental guaranteed under the Constitution of India under Article 300-A, violative of the provisions of the Municipalities Act, 1965 and contrary to the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.22100 of 1999 dated 10.10.2001 and W.P.No.18520 of 2018 05.06.2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to demolish the shop belonging to the Petitioners beside Bus stop bearing (old 34-19-4) situated at Peeda Kalava Gattu, Veerabadrapuram, Mandapeta, East Godavari District, AP or interfere with business pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SRINIVAS BASAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3.
GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
3 HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026
ORDER:
1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of respondent No.2 in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the small road-side tea stall being run by them.
2. It is submitted that the petitioners had earlier filed W.P.No.18520 of 2018 and that this Court, vide order dated 05.06.2018, disposed off the said writ petition, directing the respondents therein to follow due process of law if the subject property is required for a public purpose.
3. It is submitted that, though there is an order of this Court, the respondents have been orally directing the petitioners to vacate the said shop.
4. The learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent No.2, on receipt of written instructions, submits that respondent No.2 has identified vending zones for accommodating eligible street vendors and that the petitioners and other similarly situated vendors have been informed that they may carry on their business activities in the designated vending zones in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations.
5. The learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent No.2 further submits that the petitioners have occupied Irrigation land and that the said occupation is causing hindrance to the movement of traffic as well.
6. Recording the above submissions, the present writ petition stands
disposed off, making it clear to respondent No.2 that the petitioners shall be accommodated in an alternative vending zone area and that 15 days’ time
4 HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026 shall be granted to the petitioner to shift from the existing shop in which they are carrying on their business. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:25.08.2026 NKA
Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
5 HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026 30 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 24416 of 2026 Date: 25.08.2026
NKA