Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8579 (GAU)

ROHIM UDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./1472/2026 · 2026-06-17

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010107822026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1472/2026 ROHIM UDDIN S/O SUKUR ALI, R/O PART 2 RABHATARI, PS SOUTH SALMARA, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MEDHI, MR. A HUDA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS P BARMAN,MR. SANU HUSSAIN,N R HAQUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 18 .06. 2026 Heard Mr. A. Huda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent. 2. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner namely, Rohim Uddin under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking bail in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 287/2026 under Section 69 of BNS, 2023. Page No.# 2/2 3. The brief facts of this case is that the petitioner entered into a physical relationship with the informant, who was a married lady having two children and upon his promise to marry her she subsequently became pregnant. Thereafter, the accused fled away and blocked the informant from all source of communications. Accordingly, the instant case has been registered. 4. The case diary is received and perused. It appears from the materials on record that the petitioner was in a consensual relationship with the informant, who was a married lady having children. 5. Having regard to the above as well as the fact that the petitioner is in custody for last 30 days, the prayer for bail is allowed. 6. It is directed that the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati, Assam. 7. It is further provided that the petitioner shall cooperate with the trial and he shall not try to intimidate or influence any persons/ witnesses acquainted with the facts of this case, in any manner. 8. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. 9. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant