[2026:RJ-JP:22843] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3873/2026 Jadeja Dhruvraj Singh Digvijay Singh @ Jaisal S/o Late Digvijay Singh Udesingh Jadeja, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Laiyara, Police Station Dhrol, District Jamnagar (Gujarat) Presently Resided At Ashapura Kripa Udainagar 1 Sheri Number (Gali Number) 21, Behind Vishweshwar Mandir, Behind Shakti Niyar Mata Ji Mandir, Malviya Nagar, District Rajkot (Gujarat) (At Present Confined In Distirct Jail Karauli, District Karauli) ----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 02/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11/2024 registered at Cyber Police Station (Karauli), District Karauli for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) and 308(2) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so [2026:RJ-JP:22843] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3873/2026] no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2026; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that co-accused persons namely Muskan Halepotra Munafbhai, Govind Modani, Adil Asif Bhai Hunani and Bhargava Dilip Bhai Chotaliya have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5979/2025; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Jadeja Dhruvraj Singh Digvijay Singh @ Jaisal S/o Late Digvijay Singh Udesingh Jadeja is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of [2026:RJ-JP:22843] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3873/2026] Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in a month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 62/KAVISH