Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8575 (DEL)

GANGADHAR SHARMA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/6373/2026 · 2026-05-11

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6373/2026 GANGADHAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipanshu Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rachita Garg, Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Adv for Respondent no. 1/ GNCTD. Mr Syed Abdul Haseeb CGSC with Mr Muhammad Aamir Khan and Mr Syed Abdur Rahman Advocates for UOI. Mr. Sarthak Rana (G. P.) for R-2 and 3. Mr Santosh Kumar Rout, SC for SBI. W/SI Tiamenla PS Cyber/South East Delhi. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 11.05.2026 CM APPL. 31408/2026 (EXEMPTION) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6373/2026 3. The petitioner is for the following reliefs: This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2026 at 11:59:39 “A. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction directing the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4to defreeze and restore full operational access to the Petitioner's SBI Bank Account bearing No. 53034801918 & IFSC Code: SBIN0001407, Salabatpura Branch (01407), Surat, Gujarat. B. To direct the Respondents No. 1 to 4 to strictly comply with the judicial order dated 08.10.2025 passed by the Ld. ACJM, South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi, within a time-bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. C. Award appropriate. compensation and/or exemplary damages to the Petitioner for the illegal, arbitrary and disproportionate freezing of his bank account, for the consequent financial hardship, mental agony and harassment suffered by him, for the costs of litigation incurred, and for the wilful non-compliance of the judicial order dated 08.10.2025 passed by the Learned ACJM, South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present Case.” 4. However, at this stage, it is submitted that the Bank Account of the petitioner has been defreezed. 5. In view thereof, the petition has been rendered infructuous, and, accordingly, the same stands dismissed. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 11, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2026 at 11:59:39