Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8573 (JHR)

SHABANA PARWEEN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./8/2026 · 2026-01-08

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:356 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 8 of 2026 Shabana Parween, aged about 48 years, wife of Md. Manawar Khan, resident of village Azad Basti, P.O. and P.S. Gumla, District-Gumla ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate 02/ 08.01.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 350 of 2022, registered under sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner has moved in A.B.A. No. 1567 of 2023 which has been dismissed by order dated 25.01.2024 by this Court. He further submits that only transaction is between the petitioner, informant and others and now good sense has prevailed between the parties and compromise has taken place. He next submits that entire amount has been returned by the petitioner and in view of that in the change circumstance second anticipatory bail application has been filed. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits it appears that compromise is there. 5. Learned counsel for the informant accepts the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that informant has received ( 2026:JHHC:356 ) the amount and now compromise has taken place. 6. Considering that earlier anticipatory bail application of the petitioner has been rejected however, now good sense has prevailed between the parties and compromise has taken place in view of that in the change circumstance second anticipatory bail application can be entertained. Further the learned counsel for the informant has accepted that entire amount has been received by the informant. 7. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 350 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.08.01.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-