2026:HHC:15814 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7237 of 2026 Decided on: 11.05.2026 Urmila Devi … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:- “(i) The applicant may kindly be allowed to continue in service till the age of 60 years, at par with similarly situated Class-IV employees, and any proposed action of retiring the applicant at the age of 58 years may kindly be kept in abeyance.” 3. In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the final judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Satya Devi’s case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 11, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?