Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8571 (ALL)

BABLI URF BABLU v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/31864/2026 · 2026-09-22

Jai Prakash Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31864 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State- respondent and perused the record. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 206 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 338, 340(2), 336(3), 3(5), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Kila, District Bareilly, during the pendency of trial. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is submitted that the applicant was not named in the subject FIR. The name of the applicant was surfaced during the course of investigation in the confessional statement of co-accused. There is no direct or indirect evidence has been shown against the applicant. There is no identification parade has been conducted by the police. Learned counsel submits that applicant has not committed the alleged crime. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. As per supplementary affidavit, there is only one criminal history of the applicant, which has been explained in para '2' of the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is languishing in jail since 01.07.2026 and in case she is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail. Per contra, learned AGA, however, opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ageet Kumar Singh, Yadavendra Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Babli Urf Bablu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of the punishment, and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Babli urf Bablu be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 23, 2026 Brijesh BAIL No. 31864 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad