Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:4368-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 231 of 2022 Anita Kiran Lakda W/o Pravin Kumar Lakda Aged About 42 Years Caste - Uroan, R/o Village - Kunkuri, Gorto Line, Tehsil - Kunkuri, District - Jashpur (C.G.) Presently Residing At - Sarangarh, Government Primary School, Gondihari, Sarangarh, Tehsil - Sarangarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh
... Appellant versus Pravin Kumar Lakda S/o Jerald Lakda Aged About 42 Years Caste - Uraon, R/o - Village - Pathalgaon Tehsil - Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Anand Kumar Kujur, Advocate DB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Judgment on Board 27.01.2026 Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. The instant appeal under Section 91 of the Family Court Act Read with Section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act being ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA
2 aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated 10/11/2022 passed by the Family Court, Jashpur, District Jashpur, C.G. in Civil Suit No.17A/2022 whereby the application filed by the respondent under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act for a decree of divorce has been allowed.
2. At the very outset learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the sole appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to cost(s). SD/- SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE JUDGE Ashu