Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8564 (GAU)

BHAIRAB CH DAS v. MAMATA HOJAI, AES AND 3 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/72/2026 · 2026-06-18

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010017522026 2026:GAU-AS:8840 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/72/2026 BHAIRAB CH DAS S/O LATE KEDAR CH DAS, R/O VILLAGE- TILAPARA, P.O. AND P.S.- GOALPARA, DISTRICT- GOALPARA, ASSAM. VERSUS MAMATA HOJAI, AES AND 3 ORS. DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19. 2:DR. GAURAV KUMAR ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI- 781029. 3:ANUP KR DAS AES-1 INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL GOALPARA DISTRICT CIRCLE P.O. AND DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101. 4:SAMIM AKHTAR TREASURY OFFICER GOALPARA P.O. AND DISTRICT GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H DAS, D BARUAH Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B GOGOI(R4), R M BAROOAH(R4),MR P NAYAK(R4),MR A CHALIHA(R4) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 19.06.2026 Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor Nos. 1 & 3, submits that in compliance with the order dated 21.08.2025, passed in WP(C) No. 2678/2025, the pensionary benefits due to the petitioner have already been released. In view of above, the direction contained in the order dated 21.08.2025 is duly complied with. Accordingly, contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant