Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8563 (CHH)

BRANCH MANAGER , S.B.I. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SMT. MEENA

CR/60/2026 · 2026-02-24

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9866 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 60 of 2026 1 - Branch Manager , S.B.I. General Insurance Company Limited 2nd Flour, Raj Complex Pahadganj, Doliganj Port Bleyer, Nikobar, Andman And Nikobar, Island (Insurance Company) ... Applicant. versus 1 - Smt. Meena W/o Late Devdhari Ram Nageshiya Aged About 23 Years. 2 - Dewanshu Nageshiya S/o Late Devdhari Ram Nageshiya Aged About 04 Months, Through Mother Smt. Meena W/o Late Devdhari Ram Nageshiya, Aged About 23 Years. 3 - Situram Nageshiya S/o Mitku Nageshiya Aged About 50 Years. 4 - Chandravati W/o Situram Nageshiya Aged About 45 Years. All R/o Songersa, Thana And Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Shri RK Sahu appears on behalf of Shri KPS Gandhi, Advocates. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/02/2026 1. This Civil Revision has been filed against the order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the 7th Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. in MACT No.65 of 2025 whereby, delay in filing claim petition has been condoned. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.02.26 10:34:32 +0530 2 2. Following reliefs have been sought by way of instant civil revision:- (i) To call for the entire records pertaining to case. (ii) To set aside the impugned order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Learned 7th Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) in M.A.C.T. No-65/2025, titled as Smt. Meena vs. Branch Manager, SBI General Insurance and dismiss the said claim case filed by respondent no. 01-04/claimant. (iii) To dismiss the application filed by respondent no. 01-04/claimant u/s 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, in the interest of justice. (iv) And to give such other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, in the interest of justice. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that by the efflux of time, this Civil Revision has become infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the applicant, this Civil Revision is dismissed being infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash