DR BHARATHBUSHAN VARADHARAJULU MANDIRI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/8474/2026 · 2026-04-28
Jayant Banerji, Rajesh Rai K
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8560 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8560 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23645-DB WP No. 8474 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 8474 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
DR. BHARATHBUSHAN VARADHARAJULU MANDIRI S/O DR. G VARADHARAJULU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT NO.82/12, SHRISHAI KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL HEALTH, BUGUDIHALLI, NARASIPURA POST, (DOBBESPETE), SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562 111. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V LAKSHMINARAYANA, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SHILPA RANI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY, Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23645-DB WP No. 8474 of 2026 18TH CROSS ROAD, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 012.
3.
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, MAHATMA GANDHI MARG (RING ROAD), ANSARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI – 110 029.
BY ITS DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. N K RAMESH, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 07/03/2026 BEARING NO.ED/KEA/LEGAL/WP 6835/2026 ISSUE BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-N; b)ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 04/03/2026 AT ANNEXURE-M AND PERMIT HIM TO PURSUE PG IN MEDICAL COURSES IN ANY OF THE COLLEGES IN STATE OF KARNATAKA AND DISPOSE OF THE SAME EXPEDITIOUSLY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23645-DB WP No. 8474 of 2026 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) This petition was filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) issue a writ of certiorari, quashing the impugned endorsement dated 07.03.2026 bearing No.ED/KEA/Legal/WP6835/2026 issued by the Respondent No.2 vide Annexure – N; (ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction directing the respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 04.03.2026 at Annexure-M and permit him to pursue PG in Medical courses in any of the colleges in State of Karnataka and dispose of the same expeditiously, to meet the ends of justice. (iii) grant such other order or direction as it deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. On a previous occasion, the learned counsel for the petitioner had placed reliance upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.Tanvi Behl vs. Shrey Goel and others1 to contend that admission to PG courses on the basis of reservation is impermissible in view of the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the said judgment.
3. However, it is fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that now since the entire admission 1 2025 INSC 125
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23645-DB WP No. 8474 of 2026 process has drawn to a close, as far as the petition seeking admission to the post graduate course is concerned, has lost its relevance. However, he contends that the legal question being sought to be raised in the instant petition, be left open for him to be agitated, in case a cause of action arises.
4. It goes without saying that the judgment of the Supreme Court, would be binding on the State of Karnataka. It is the constitutional duty of the State Government to follow the same.
5. The learned AGA, who is present in Court is required to communicate this order to the appropriate Authority of the State Government for its perusal.
6. Subject to the aforesaid observation, this petition is
disposed of. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE KG/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15