Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8554 (BOM)

RAJENDRA P. PATHWARDHAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS.

WP/4580/2026 · 2026-09-15

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

40-WP-4580-2026(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4580 OF 2026 Rajendra P. Pathwardhan ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents —————— Mr. Vinit Dhotre (Through V.C.) for the Petitioner. Mr. A. A. Alaspurkar, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH & NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2026. P. C. : 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the cause presently does not survive for consideration and seeks permission to withdraw the Petition. The issue in the present case was as regards the impediment, which could have been caused to the procession by reason of an illegal construction. He would submit that the event has taken place without any impediment. 2. In view of the above, the Petition is disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to revive the cause in the event the same arises in future. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Jamadar-SL 1 of 1 2026:BHC-KOL:8880-DB