[2026:RJ-JP:22963] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8101/2026 1. Avtar Singh S/o Kewal Singh, Age About 24 Year, R/o Jatana Khurd Police Station Junir Distt. Mansa (Punjab) (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi). 2. Yudhveer Singh S/o Bheem Singh, Age About 22 Years, R/o Jatana Khurd Police Station Junir Distt. Mansa (Punjab) (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8239/2026 1. Hatey Singh S/o Deewan Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Khetakheda, Police Station Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi). 2. Gulab Khan S/o Sham Khan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Daraj, Police Station Tapai, District Bharnala (Punjab) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shazadi Bano, Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 04/06/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 191/2026 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 8, 15 & 29 of NDPS Act. [2026:RJ-JP:22963] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8101/2026] 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They also submits that accused-petitioners are in custody since long. They further submits that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and the accused-petitioners are not required for further investigation. They further submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against accused-petitioners except the accused-petitioner, Gulab Khan S/o Sham Khan; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, pray that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsels for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and concurs with the fact that there is one criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner, Gulab Khan S/o Sham Khan and no criminal antecedents are registered against the rest of the accused-petitioners. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the arguments advanced by learned counsels for both the parties and the material made available before this Court; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 08.05.2026; that the Doda post chura recovered from the possession of all the four accused-petitioners is 26 kg 190 grams i.e., below commercial quantity; that the accused-petitioners are not required for further investigation; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of [2026:RJ-JP:22963] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8101/2026] the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (1) Avtar Singh S/o Kewal Singh, (2) Yudhveer Singh S/o Bheem Singh, (3) Hatey Singh S/o Deewan Singh & (4) Gulab Khan S/o Sham Khan are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J PUNEET KUMAR/111-112