Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8553 (AP)

L.CH.SUDHAKAR v. STATE OF AP

CRLRC/28/2019 · 2026-08-06

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010006822019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOS: 28, 29, 30 and 31 OF 2019 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOS: 28/2019 Between: 1. L.CH.SUDHAKAR, D.NO. 17/825-A, TILAK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARAVATHI 2. K GOPAL RAO IMPLEADED OR NOT TO BE CHECKED, ANANTAPUR ...RESPONDENT(S): CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 29/2019 Between: 1. L.CH.SUDHAKAR, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. TEACHER, RAILWAY HIGH SCHOOL,GUNTAKAL,D.NO.17-825-A, TILAK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.Nos.28, 29, 30 and 31 of 2019 Dated 07.08.2026 2. K SULOCHANA, AGED 57 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, RIO. D.NO.20/143, HANUMESH NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 30/2019 Between: 1. L.CH.SUDHAKAR, RAILWAY HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTAKAL, D.NO.17/825/-A, TILALK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AMARAVATHI. 2. K GOPALA RAO, D.NO.20/143, HANUMESH NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 31/2019 Between: 1. L.CH.SUDHAKAR, OCC. RAILWAY HIGH SCLHOOL,GUNTAKAL, D.NO.17/825-A, TILAK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGHCOURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI. 2. K SULOCHANA, D.NO.20, HANUMESH NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.Nos.28, 29, 30 and 31 of 2019 Dated 07.08.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present in these four cases. 2. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the learned Mediator conducted the mediation proceedings and submitted a report stating that the dispute has been amicably settled. 3. In view of the Mediator's report, the Criminal Revision Case is liable to be disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at before the learned Mediator. 4. In view of the settlement, the Criminal Revision Cases are disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Guntakal, in C.C.Nos.265, 266, 267 and 268 of 2015, vide judgments dated 27.06.2018 and 28.06.2018, as confirmed in Criminal Appeal Nos.71, 72, 73 and 74 of 2018, vide judgment dated 10.01.2019, by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Gooty, are hereby set aside. Accordingly, the Petitioner/Accused is acquitted under 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.Nos.28, 29, 30 and 31 of 2019 Dated 07.08.2026 Section 320(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO,J Date :07.08.2026 KMS 5 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.Nos.28, 29, 30 and 31 of 2019 Dated 07.08.2026 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 28, 29, 30 and 31 of 2019 Date: 07.08.2026 KMS 199