[2026:RJ-JP:22888] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2723/2026 Mohammad Sakir S/o Fateh Mohammad, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Raniyala Khurd, Police Station Utavada, District Palval (Haryana). (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4546/2026 1. Saalim S/o Sahajat, Age 19 Years, Kukarpuri, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 2. Aakoop S/o Mubeen, Age 25 Years, Ghausinga, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Mustaq Ahmed Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar Ms. Swati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 03/06/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 41/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), [2026:RJ-JP:22888] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2723/2026] 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long. It is also submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that co-accused persons who are Juvenile have already been enlarged on bail; that conclusion of trial may take considerable time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- petitioners but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and material available before the Court and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 24.01.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that co-accused persons who are Juvenile have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 496/2026; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits [2026:RJ-JP:22888] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2723/2026] of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (i) Mohammad Sakir S/o Fateh Mohammad (ii) Saalim S/o Sahajat (iii) Aakoop S/o Mubeen are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 31-32/SHIVANI