Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8548 (BOM)

SATISH RAJMOHAN TANDON v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/594/2026 · 2026-09-09

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

sns 31-wp-594-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.594 OF 2026 Satish Rajmohan Tandon … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Samarth S. Karmarkar a/w. Adv. Tarun S. Shrivastava, Adv. Adarsh Mishra for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w. Adv. Digvijay S. Kachare, Adv. Anay Joshi, Adv. Sumit Kumar Nimbalkar, Adv. Sanika Joshi, Adv. Saili Dhuru for the Respondent- CBI. Mr. P. P. Chavhan i/by Adv. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent-BMC. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 9th September, 2026 P.C.:- 1) Present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for registration of F.I.R. in pursuance of the complaint filed by the Petitioner with the concerned Police Authorities. 2) In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, Petition is not maintainable and is accordingly disposed off. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1 SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Digitally signed by SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Date: 2026.09.16 11:40:59 +0530