[2026:RJ-JP:22986] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5342/2026 Parvej S/o Hakmuddin, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Kukarpuri, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (Presently Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5344/2026 Jaleesh S/o Aslam, Age 21 Years, R/o Khedli Gumani Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain, Mr. Vafik Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 05/06/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 82/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. [2026:RJ-JP:22986] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5342/2026] 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of some applications found installed in their mobile phones, which are capable of being used in the commission of cyber fraud. They also submit that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long. They further submit that charge-sheet has already been filed and there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners. They further submit that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, pray that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsels for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioners. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the arguments advanced by learned counsels for both the parties and the material made available before this Court that the charge- sheet against the accused-petitioners has been filed; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 09.03.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioners; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:22986] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5342/2026] 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (1) Parvej S/o Hakmuddin & (2) Jaleesh S/o Aslam are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J PUNEET KUMAR/210-211s