Rajkumari Jamini and 7 Ors v. State of Manipur and Anr
MC(WA)/57/2026 · 2026-08-30
Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 854 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 854 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl. No. 18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC(WA) No. 57 of 2026 [Ref: WA No. 43 of 2024]
1. Rajkumar Jamini Devi, aged about 55 years, D/o RK Birachandra Singh, resident of Bashikhong Kitna Panung, Singjamei, P.O. Singjamei, P.S. Irilbung, and District Imphal East, Manipur 795008. 2. Ng. Nasiiru Mercy, aged about 39 years, D/o H. Ngaonii, resident of Phaibuung Khullen Village, P.O. & P.S. Tadubi District Senapati, Mnaipur-
795104. 3. Irengbam Anand Singh, aged about 49 years, S/o Irengbam Ibobi Singh, resident of Khagempalli Pankha, P.O. & P.S. Singjamei, District Imphal West, Manipur - 795001. 4. S. Peimichon, aged about 51 years, D/o (L) S. Mapangthei, resident of Kachai Village, P.O. & P.S. Somdal Village, District Ukhrul, Mnaipur
795144. 5. Kongbrailatpam Devajani Sharmee, aged about 42 years, D/o Kongbrailatpam Guneswar Singh, resident of Uripok Takhellambam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Imphal West, District Imphal West, Manipur 795001. 6. Kshetrimayum Subasini Devi, aged about 58 years, D/o (L) Ksh. Moduchandra Singh, resident of Haobam Marak Keisham Leikai, P.O. Imphal, P.S. Singjamei, District Imphal West, Manipur - 795001. 7. Laishram Motilal Singh, aged about 51 years, S/o (L) L. Gourachand Singh, resident of Brahmapur Laipubam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Porompat, District Imphal West, Manipur 795005. 8. Nianglianching Guite, aged about 50 years, D/o hauzakhai Guite, resident of Sorathen, P.O. Litan, P.S. Phungyar, District Kamjong, Manipur -
795145. ... APPLICANTS
- VERSUS -
1. The State of Manipur represented by the Chief Secretary/Commissioner/Secretary, Education (S), Govt. of Manipur, Secretariat Building, Babupara, P.O. & P.S. Imphal, District Imphal West District, Manipur – 795001. 2. The Director of Education (S), Govt. of Manipur, Directorate of Education (S), Keishampat, P.O. & P.S. Imphal, Imphal West District, Manipur - 795001. 2026:MNHC:192-DB
... RESPONDENTS
BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
For applicants Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, Advocate For respondents Ms. R.K. Emily, State counsel led by Mr. S. Nepolean, learned Senior Advocate Date of Order 31.08.2026
(ORDER)
(Order of the Court was made by Mr. M. Sundar, CJ)
[1]
Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel on record for Miscellaneous Case (MC) applicants and Ms. R.K. Emily, learned State counsel led by Mr. S. Nepolean, learned Senior Advocate for both the respondents are before this Court.
[2]
Captioned MC has been filed with a prayer to bring on record an additional affidavit and notification dated 11.12.2020. [3]
Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel, adverted to proceedings made by this Court in the listing on 04.06.2026 more particularly 2(two) paragraphs thereat which read as follows: ‘A careful perusal of the impugned order brings to light that in WP(C) No. 53 of 2021, a Notification dated 11.12.2020 issued by the Director of Education (S), Manipur has been assailed. Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel for writ appellants very fairly submits that this 11.12.2020 Notification impacts the 8 writ appellants before this Court also but this 11.12.2020 Notification is not before this Court. Page 3 of 3
Faced with the above situation, Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel for writ appellants sought time to produce the afore-referred 11.12.2020 Notification. We make it clear that State Counsel Mr. Y. Robert shall also assist the Court by producing this Notification in the next listing.’ [4]
Learned counsel for MC applicants submitted that captioned MC has been filed now pursuant to what unfurled in the hearing on 04.06.2026. [5]
Mr. S. Nepolean, learned Senior Advocate, on instructions, submits that he is not opposing the captioned MC, State would not be filing an affidavit- in-opposition and he has no objection to the prayer in captioned MC being acceded to. [6]
In the light of the fair stand taken by learned senior counsel for State, this Court need not be detained further by this matter. It will suffice to write that as regards the additional affidavit and notification which is being brought on record all rights and contentions of both sides on merits stand preserved and this order will neither impede nor impel any submissions on merits. [7]
Captioned MC allowed/ordered as prayed for albeit with afore- referred observations. There shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE Indrajeet
LAIRENMAYU M INDRAJEET SINGH Digitally signed by LAIRENMAYUM INDRAJEET SINGH Date: 2026.08.31 17:40:18 +05'30'