[2026:RJ-JP:22790] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2832/2026 Sandeep Singh S/o Jagdish Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ghamudaki Police Station Sikari District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3138/2026 1. Aakib S/o Late Hasan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kawan Ka Was, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). 2. Arman S/o Israil @ Rungal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Punay, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg) 3. Talim S/o Ali Mohammad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Alighani, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). 4. Aspak S/o Ali Mohammad, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Alghani, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 01/06/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:22790] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2832/2026] 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 38/2026 registered at Police Station Deeg, District Sikrai, Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 316(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 313 & 61(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that co- accused persons namely Juvenile Conflict With Law F and Juvenile Conflict With Law D have already been enlarged on bail; that trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications and concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 30.01.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that co-accused persons namely Juvenile Conflict With Law F and Juvenile Conflict With Law D have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.02.2026 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. [2026:RJ-JP:22790] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2832/2026] 341/2026; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Sandeep Singh S/o Jagdish Singh, Aakib S/o Late Hasan, Arman S/o Israil @ Rungal, Talim S/o Ali Mohammad and Aspak S/o Ali Mohammad are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 39-40/EKTA