Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8538 (KAR)

SMT MALATHI DEEPAK v. REPCO BANK LTD

WP/7757/2026 · 2026-03-18

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16012 WP No. 7757 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 7757 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MALATHI DEEPAK ALIAS LALITHA BAI W/O SRI DEEPAK N.K, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.440, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN VIJAYA BANK CIRCLE, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU-570023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAY N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. REPCO BANK LTD NEAR SHANTINAGAR HOTEL, PANCHAMANTRA ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGARA, MYSURU-570023. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER. 2. SALE OFFICER, REPCO BANK LTD, NEAR SHANTINAGAR HOTEL, PANCHAMANTRA ROAD, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16012 WP No. 7757 of 2026 KUVEMPUNAGARA, MYSURU-570023. 3. SRI. N.K. DEEPAK NIKKAM, S/O LATE N.B.KRISHNAMURTHY. AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, DIRECTOR, THE MYSORE CITY SRISHIVACHATRAPATHI, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.27/1A, NEW NO.1/A, THEOBALD ROAD, NAZARABAD, MYSURU-570010. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ATTACHMENT NOTICE DATED 20.01.2026 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 94 OF MULTI STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 2002 READ WITH RULE 37(5) AND RULE 37 (11) (D) OF THE MULTI STATE CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RULE 2002 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 (PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -G) IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16012 WP No. 7757 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner herein is assailing the attachment notice dated 20.01.2026 (Annexure–G), issued by the respondent No.2-Sale Officer of REPCO Bank. 3. The respondents are not amenable to writ jurisdiction, as they are not instrumentalities under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17