1 ( 2026:HHC:19333 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 407 of 2026 Decided on: 22.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Amin Chand ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 14.05.2026 alongwith copy of Office Order dated 13.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Mandi by passing a detailed speaking order dated 13.05.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:19333 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 22nd May, 2026 Judge (raman)