NETRAM GURJAR S/O GODARAM GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7254/2026 · 2026-06-03
Sangeeta Sharma V J
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8535 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8535 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22910] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7254/2026 Netram Gurjar S/o Godaram Gurjar, R/o Village Raipura Bhal Kishori, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar, Raj. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deshraj Sain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)
Order 03/06/2026
1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the impugned FIR No. 41/2026 registered with the Police Station Partapgarh District Alwar for the offences punishable under Section(s) 8/15 of NDPS Act in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Section(s) 8/29 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused -petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the co-accused Jagdish Gurjar from whose possession contraband article has been recovered has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this court. There are no criminal antecedents of similar nature registered against the accused-petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody since long and the trial will take its
[2026:RJ-JP:22910] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7254/2026] own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and concurs with the fact that no criminal case of similar nature has ever been registered against the accused petitioner but submits that one case is registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323 and 324, therefore his bail application deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, and taking into account the fact that bail has already been granted to the co-accused from whose possession contraband articles containing 2.220KG doda chura were recovered by the co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 22.05.2026 passed in SB criminal misc. second bail application No. 8093/2026; an offence under Section 8/29 NDPS has been alleged against him, there are no criminal antecedents of the similar nature against the petitioner; that the petitioner has remained in judicial custody since 19.04.2026 and that the trial is likely to take considerable time for its conclusion, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, considers it just and proper to extend the benefit of bail to the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of the BNSS
6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Netram Gurjar S/o Godaram Gurjar, arrested in connection with the aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided
[2026:RJ-JP:22910] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7254/2026] he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all the dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. 7.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. In case of breach of the condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 118/ashu/416