Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 5664 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 5664 of 2026 Arunkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, Inspector of Police, Arni Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.No.52/2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.52 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Kalaikumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal side)
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.02.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 303 (2), 326 (a) of BNS r/w 21 (1) Mines and Minerals Act, in Crime No.52 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 1 unit of river sand in a tractor. Hence, the case. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5664 of 2026
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is only a driver and has been in custody since 01.02.2026. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and undertakes not to tamper with the witnesses. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the petitioner is having three previous cases and has been regularly doing similar nature of offences. He would further submit that if the petitioner is released on bail, he may abscond and tamper with witnesses and hence, he opposed the grant of bail.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side. 6.In such view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), taking into consideration of continuous exploitation against the nature, any mischief continuously committed by the persons against the nature should not be taken lightly. In view of the three previous cases against this petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5664 of 2026
7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 05-03-2026 ep __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5664 of 2026 To 1.Inspector of Police, Arni Taluk Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5664 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. ep CRL OP No. 5664 of 2026 05-03-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis