[2026:RJ-JP:22850] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4069/2026 1. Sahil Son Of Shri Majjal, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Kolari, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 2. Vajid Son Of Shri Harun, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Kolari, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 02/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 25/2026 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 308(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a), 313 and 303(2) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its [2026:RJ-JP:22850] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4069/2026] own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove. It is further submitted that there are four criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner Vajid and one criminal antecedent registered against the accused- petitioner Sahil. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused- petitioners may not be enlarged on bail. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 30.01.2026; that the accused-petitioners are on bail in other criminal cases registered against them; that co-accused namely Juvenile Conflict With Law M Son Shri Khurshid has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.02.2026 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 361/2026; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Sahil Son Of Shri Majjal and Vajid Son Of Shri Harun are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of [2026:RJ-JP:22850] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4069/2026] Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence once in a month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 69/KAVISH