Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:17499 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 6899 of 2026 Decided on : 18.05.2026 Ankita …Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate
General,
for
the respondents-State. Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 & 4 and respondent No.3, respectively.
2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within 12 weeks’ 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:17499 from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
May 18, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)