Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8530 (ALL)

RAVI JAAT AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/9256/2026 · 2026-09-22

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9256 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicants and the Learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.182/2026 under Section 112(2) B.N.S. and Section 3/4 of the Public Gambling Act, P.S. -Transyamuna, District - Agra, with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail as the applicants apprehend their arrest in the abovementioned case. 3. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. has raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the instant application by submitting that the applicants do not apprehend their arrest as the offences that have been alleged against the applicants do not entail in the event of a conviction, a punishment of more than seven years. He further contends that appropriate protection has been provided in the BNSS itself in the form of Section 35(3) BNSS and the judgments passed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Anr. 2014 (8) SCC 273, Mohd. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand and anr. (2023) 8 SCC 63 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation 2026 INSC 115 also safeguard the interest of the applicants. 4. Upon being confronted with the objection raised by the learned A.G.A., the Learned counsel for the applicants failed to satisfactorily meet the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kiran Tiwari, Mahesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Jaat And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) same. 5. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to dispose of the present application with a direction to the Investigating Officer to strictly comply with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar (supra), Mohd. Asfak Alam (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra) while conducting the investigation of the aforesaid case. 6. The application stands disposed of. September 23, 2026 A. Pandey NABAIL No. 9256 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad