[2026:RJ-JP:22974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8343/2026 1. Sawar Lal S/o Gordhan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Benpa, Police Station Dooni, District Tonk (Rajasthan) 2. Suresh S/o Devkaran, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Santhali, Police Station Dooni, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Tonk). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 04/06/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioners in connection with the impugned FIR No. 110/2026 registered with the Police Station Dooni District Tonk for the offences punishable under Section(s) 19/54 of Excise Act in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Section(s) 19/54 of Excise Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the recovery has already been effected. There are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners Sawar Lal and there is one other similar nature of case registered against the accused petitioner Suresh in which he is on bail; accused-petitioners have been in [2026:RJ-JP:22974] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8343/2026] custody since long and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused petitioner Sawar Lal and there are four cases registered against the accused-petitioner Suresh and one out of which is of similar nature. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, and taking into account the fact that the recovery has already been effected. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner Sawar Lal and Suresh is on bail in other similar nature of cases registered against him; accused-petitioners have been in custody since 30.04.2026 and that the trial will take its own time to conclude, Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, considers it just and proper to extend the benefit of bail to the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of the BNSS 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Sawar Lal S/o Gordhan, 2. Suresh S/o Devkaran, arrested in connection with the aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided they personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all the dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:22974] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8343/2026] 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. In case of breach of the condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 136/ashu/416