Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8525 (BOM)

VIRESH JOSHI S/O GANGARAM JOSHI v. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT. OF REVENUE

WP/5676/2026 · 2026-09-11

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2-wp.5676.2026.doc Salunke IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5676 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6342 OF 2026 Viresh Joshi S/o. Gangaram Joshi & Ors. } Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. } Respondents Mr. Parth Sanghrajka with Mr. Abhishek Kale, Mr. Aditya Khare, Mr. Shreyas Maheshwari and Mr. Atharva Bhilare i/b Naik Naik & Co., Advocates for the Petitioners. Mr. Amit Munde, Special Counsel with Ms. Jai Vohra, Advocates for Respondent No. 2. Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader with Ms. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for Respondent No. 4. CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, submits that the Petitioners are not inclined to press the instant Writ Petition and seek to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to press appropriate reliefs before the Competent Authority in accordance with law. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents have no objection for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 1 JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2026.09.16 10:39:55 +0530 2-wp.5676.2026.doc 4. In the light of the withdrawal of the writ petition, the pending Interim Application does not survive and stands disposed of. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2