Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8525 (AP)

Tiyyagura Prabhakar Reddy v. Sri.S.Suresh Kumar,

CC/3438/2025 · 2026-08-18

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010598042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3438/2025 Between: 1. TIYYAGURA PRABHAKAR REDDY, S/O.BHASKAR REDDY , AGED 45 YEARS, D.NO.401,SREE ENCLAVE APARTMENT, HOUSING BOARD COLONY,NALLAPADU ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT-05 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBUN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. 2. SRI D BHUSAHANAM, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MANGALIGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI ALEEM BASHA, COMMISSIONER MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MANGALIGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI P SAMPATH KUMAR, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ,ANDHRA PRADESH AT PRIME HILL CREST ,VADDESWARAM,TADEPALLI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 1.09.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No. 11484/2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 3. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3438OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11484 of 2024, dated 01.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 98 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3438 of 2025 Date: 19.08.2026 KGM