HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23052 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) यह िक माननीय न्यायालय उत्प्रेषण प्रकृ ित के यािचकादेश, आदेश/िनदेर्श के माध्यम से याचीगण के िवरूद्ध आरोिपत अपराध संख्या 197 वषर् 2026 अन्तगर्त धारा 351(2), 49, 303(2) भारतीय न्याय संिहता, थाना कल्यानपुर, जनपद फतेहपुर की प्राथिमकी िदनांिकत 02.09.2026 िनरस्त करने की महती कृ पा करें। (ii) यह िक माननीय न्यायालय परमादेश प्रकृ ित के यािचकादेश आदेश/िनदेर्श के माध्यम से आरोिपत अपराध संख्या 197 वषर् 2026 अन्तगर्त धारा 351(2), 49, 303(2) भारतीय न्याय संिहता, थाना कल्यानपुर, जनपद फतेहपुर की प्राथिमकी िदनांिकत 02.09.2026 में याचीगण को िगरफ्तार करने से उत्तरवादीगण समेत उनके सहयोगी सहकमीर् अधीनस्थ अन्यान्य सम्बिन्धत समस्त अिधकारीगण / कमर्चारीगण को मना करने की महती कृ पा करें।" 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners after some length of arguments on merits made an innocuous prayer that before arresting the petitioners police may be directed to follow the principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposed the petition on merits but he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Nisha And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and no objection by learned A.G.A. on innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, we are inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and provision of Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S September 23, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 23052 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad