Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8515 (GAU)

JITENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR v. SWAPNEEL PAUL, IAS AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026 · 2026-06-18

Manish Choudhury

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010111112026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/307/2026 JITENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR SON OF LATE CHANDRA NATH SARMA, RESIDENT OF APARTMENT NO. 401, RIANSHI WOOD APARTMENT, LAKHIMI PATH, HATIGAON, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781038, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM., REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMELY SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O SHIBA PRASAD CHAKRABORTY, R/O HOUSE NO. 76, K.K. PATH, 3RD BYE LANE, CHENIKUTHI HILL SIDE, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781003 2: INDU DEVI WIFE OF LATE CHANDRA NATH SARMA RESIDENT OF APARTMENT NO. 401 RIANSHI WOOD APARTMENT LAKHIMI PATH HATIGAON DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781038 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMELY SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O SHIBA PRASAD CHAKRABORTY R/O HOUSE NO. 76 K.K. PATH 3RD BYE LANE CHENIKUTHI HILL SIDE GUWAHATI DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 78100 VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 SWAPNEEL PAUL, IAS AND ANR DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, KAMRUP (M), OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, LICHUBAGAN, HENGERABARI, KAMRUP (METRO), GUWAHATI-781036, ASSAM. 2:MRINAL BORAH A.C.S. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER) OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER LICHUBAGAN HENGERABARI KAMRUP (METRO) GUWAHATI-781036 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA, MOMI KALITA,MR N M DEKA,MR M M ZAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 19-06-2026 Mr. Iranglube, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. S. Chamaria, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that during the pendency of the contempt petition, the relief sought for by the petitioners, has been granted to the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners do not want to proceed further with the contempt petition. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Iranglube, learned counsel for the petitioners, the contempt petition is closed. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant