[2026:RJ-JP:22339] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9357/2026 1. Hari Singh Saini S/o Shri Gangaram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Khadraya, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Jagdish Singh S/o Shri Manak Chand, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Post Baroli Choth, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan) 3. Achal Singh S/o Shri Roop Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Girish Vihar Colony, Odela Road, Dholpur (Raj.) 4. Vinit Kumar S/o Shri Bharat Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/ o Village Jamoli, Tehsil Palval, District Faridabad (Haryana) 5. Jogendra Singh S/o Shri Shivji Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Manpur, Tehsil Saipau, District Dholpur (Raj.) 6. Kishan Singh Yadav S/o Shri Rupiram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Visali, Post Titpuri, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar (Raj.) 7. Ramsharan Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Sodan Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Bhaiseda, Post Pahari, Tehsil Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.) 8. Govind Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Radheyshyam Sharma, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Post Khankhar, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 9. Uttam Chand S/o Shri Rammurti, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Jagwada, Tehsil Hindaun, District Karauli (Raj.) 10. Narendra Singh S/o Shri Sher Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village And Post Raisas, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 11. Narendra Singh Kushwah S/o Shri Ramkishan, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Lahas, District Jhalawar. 12. Norat Mal Teli S/o Shri Balu Ram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Para K.k. Gopal, Kalera, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) 13. Ranjeet Garhwal S/o Shri Mota Ram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Laxan Ka Bas, Khairthal-Sikari, District [2026:RJ-JP:22339] (2 of 4) [CW-9357/2026] Khairthal (Raj.) 14. Ramji Kharol S/o Shri Dhanna Lal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Devpura, Post And Tehsil Piplu, District Tonk (Rajasthan) 15. Harun Khan S/o Chhutmal Khan, Aged About 54 Years, R/ o Village Chamoda, Tehsil Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) 16. Somdutt Yadav S/o Shri Ram Kumar, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Mainaki, Tehsil Tijara, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) 17. Aas Mohammad S/o Shri Ghamndi Khan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Ram Bas Jhopadi, Tehsil Tijara, District Khiarthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) 18. Ram Singh S/o Shri Phool Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/ o Village Jogawad, Tehsil Mundawar, Bhanot, District Alwar (Rajasthan) 19. Devendra Kumar S/o Shri Brijendra Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Usrani, Tehsil Kumher, District Deeg (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Its Chairman And Managing Director. 2. The Executive Director, (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Sawai Madhopur Depot, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) 4. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Dholpur Depot, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) 5. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Alwar Depot, District Alwar (Rajasthan) 6. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Bharatpur Depot, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) 7. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Ajay Meru Depot, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) [2026:RJ-JP:22339] (3 of 4) [CW-9357/2026] 8. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Ajmer Depot, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) 9. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Tijara Depot, District Tijara-Khairthal (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 26/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties, at the outset, submits that since, the issue involved in the instant writ petition has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Dauji Prasad & Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14614/2024) decided on 30.10.2025, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit representation. 2. In view of limited prayer, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit representation before the respondents and in case, after examining the representation, the respondents find that cases of the petitioners are also covered by the judgments in the case of Dauji Prasad (Supra) Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8810/2014) decided on 25.01.2017, referred in the order dated 30.10.2025, then similar benefits shall be granted to the petitioners. [2026:RJ-JP:22339] (4 of 4) [CW-9357/2026] 3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 41/NEERU