M/s Shri Durgamba v. Bilaspur Urban Public Transport Society Limited
MCC/144/2026 · 2026-02-10
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 851 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 851 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:7587
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 144 of 2026 M/s Shri Durgamba Through Its Authorized Signatory Avinash T., S/o Shri Tharanath Shetty, Aged About 34 Years, Having Its Registered Office At Main Road, Kundapura, Udupi District Karnataka - 576201
... Petitioner versus Bilaspur Urban Public Transport Society Limited Through It Secretary, Office of BUPTS, 1st Floor, New Jila Vyapar Evam Udyog Kendra, Office Premises of Collector, Bilaspur, C.G. --- Presently At Office of BUPTS, Municipal Corporation, Nehru Chowk, Vikas Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Bilaspur (C.G.) - 495001
... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samrath Singh, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Order on Board 11.02.2026
1. Heard Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Samrath Singh appearing for the respondent.
2. This MCC has been registered on the basis of a PUD dated 19.01.2026 received from Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Shrivastava, former Judge of this High Court, who was appointed as the Arbitrator from the side of respondent in ARBR No. 3/2025 vide order dated 03.11.2025 passed by this Court. Vide the said PUD, Mr. Justice Shrivastava has informed that he intends to recuse from the said proceedings because of his recent personal problems.
3. Mr. Samrath Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2026.02.13 19:44:53 +0530
2 that in view of the above facts situation, a new Arbitrator from the side of the respondent would be required to be appointed by this Hon’ble Court and he proposes the name of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari, a former Judge of this High Court.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant has no objection.
5. In view of the above, this Court deems it appropriate to appoint Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari, a retired Judge of this High Court from the side of respondent in place of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shrivastava, to be the Arbitrator and thereafter, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Minhajuddin as well as Mr. Tiwari may appoint the third Arbitrator. Thereafter, they may adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the applicant and respondent arising out of and/ or in relation of agreement.
6. Accordingly, this MCC stands disposed of.
7. A copy of this order be communicated to Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari as well as Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gulam Minhajuddin, retired Judges of this High Court, for information and necessary action, forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Preeti