Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8508 (JHR)

SHYAM ROUT @ SHYAM RAUT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1870/2026 · 2026-04-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:13072 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1870 of 2026 1. Shyam Rout @ Shyam Raut, aged about 53 years, son of Late Gopal Raut, resident of Village- Chandubathan, Bhelwadangal, P.O. Saraiyahat, P.S. Saraiyahat, District- Dumka (Jharkhand) 2. Mukesh Kumar Raut @ Mukesh Kumar Rout, aged about 19 years, son of Sitaram Raut, resident of Village- Chandubathan, Bhelwadangal, P.O. Saraiyahat, P.S. Saraiyahat, District- Dumka (Jharkhand) 3. Mantu Kumar, aged 18 years, son of Shyam Raut, resident of Village- Chandubathan, Bhelwadangal, P.O. Saraiyahat, P.S. Saraiyahat, District- Dumka (Jharkhand) … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ----- 03/04.05.2026 On mention slip of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this matter has been posted today. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in paragraph nos. 2 and 6 of the order no.2, dated 29.04.2026, the name of the district has been wrongly typed as Giridih in place of Dumka. He further submits that in paragraph 6, another error has occurred and in place of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka, it has been wrongly typed as S.D.J.M., Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that it appears that it has occurred inadvertently. 4. In view of the above, let in paragraph nos. 2 and 6 of the said order, let it be read as Dumka in place of District- Giridih. Further, in paragraph 6, the name of the Court be read as the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka in place of the learned S.D.J.M., Giridih. 5. Since the error has occurred inadvertently and in that view of the matter, two weeks further time from today is extended to the petitioners to surrender before the learned Court. 6. The order no.02, dated 29.04.2026 is modified to the above effect. 7. Rest of the order is kept intact. 8. Let this order be treated as part of the said order. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 4th May, 2026 Ajay/