Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8508 (CHH)

SMT. SHANTI BAI TANDAN v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

WPS/12443/2025 · 2026-03-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12827 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12443 of 2025 1. Smt. Shanti Bai Tandan W/o Late Shri Parasram Tandan Aged About 70 Years R/o Vill- P.O. Sukulkari, Tahsil- Pachpedi, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. Food Corporation Of India Assistant General Manager (Cpf/pension) Headquarter At 16-20, Barakhambha Lane, New Delhi, 110001, 2. The Zonal Manager (West) Food Corporation Of India, Zonal Office- Rajendra Nagar, Datta Pada Road, Borivali, Mumbai- 400066 (Maharashtra) 3. The General Manager (Cpf/pension) Food Corporation Of India, Zonal Office- Rajendra Nagar, Datta Pada Road, Borivali, Mumbai, 400066 (Maharashtra) 4. The Regional Manager Food, Corporation Of India, Regional Office, Pandri, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Raipur, Dist- Raipur (C.G.) 5. The Divisional Manager Food Corporation Of India, Divisional Office, Sikola Basti, Dhamdha Road, Durg, Dist- Durg (C.G.) 6. The Central P.F. Commissioner Epfo Head Office Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 14 Bhikaiji Cama Place New Delhi-110066 SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.03.18 11:13:42 +0530 2 7. The Regional P.F. Commissioner Regional Office, Block- D, Scheme-32, Indira Gandhi Commercial Premises, Raipur, Dist- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manjul Pal, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 5 : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondent No.6 and 7 : Mr. Bhupendra Sriwas, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 17/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 5 submits that the relief as claimed in this writ petition, has been granted to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner does not dispute above submission of learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and submits that in view of reply submitted on behalf of respondents, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. 3. In view of above, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-