Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8505 (KAR)

SRI SANTOSH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1353/2026 · 2026-03-03

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12894 CRL.P No. 1353 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1353 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI.SANTOSH SON OF LATE VENKATAPPA, GED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/ AT 2ND CROSS, RAJKUMAR BADAVANE, MANDYA CITY, MANDYA - 571 401 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.HANUMESH.H.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MANDYA WEST POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SRI.MAHESH SON OF NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/ AT CPC-170, MANDYA CENTRAL POLICE STATION ANNAPURNHESWARI NAGAR, MANDYA CITY, MANDYA – 571 401 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF COGNIZANCE DATED 03.11.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12894 CRL.P No. 1353 of 2026 AND C.J.M COURT MANDYA IN C.C.NO.1311/2023 AND SUBSEQUENT ORDER OF COGNIZANCE DATED 22.05.2024 PASSED BY THE PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (II AD AND SJ) MANDYA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 279,353,307 R/W 149 OF IPC BY COMMITTAL AND REGISTRATION OF S.C.NO.54/2024, ON RESPONDENT POLICE FILING THE CHARGE SHEET AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the proceedings in S.C.No.54/2024. The matter has been committed to the Court of Session and the charge is framed in the case at hand against accused Nos.1 to 5. The petitioner is accused No.1. The order of framing of charge reads as follows: “Accused No.1 to 5 are present. Since there is sufficient material to frame charges against accused, charges framed read over and explained to the accused in the language known to them. Accused denied the charges levelled against them and claimed to be tried. Hence, for FTD, call on 25.02.2025.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12894 CRL.P No. 1353 of 2026 2. In that light, this Court would not lend its protective hands under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. at this juncture. 3. It is open to the petitioner to urge all the contentions before the concerned Court at the appropriate time. 4. With the above said observation, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE DR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6