Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8504 (HP)

SANJEEV KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. RAKESH KANWAR

COPC/387/2026 · 2026-05-21

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:HHC:18846 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 387 of 2026 Decided on: 21.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwer …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of Office Order dated 20.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court, higher pay scale of Rs. 41,600/- after two years of regular service subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No. 4830/2023 and any other legal remedies, has been allowed in favour of the petitioners, as per Government letter dated 30.12.2025. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:18846 ) 2. Since judgment under reference stood duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 21st May, 2026 Judge (raman)