Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010022592025 2026:GAU-AS:7487 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/430/2025 HELENA SAIKIA AND ORS W/O- LT MASLEM ALI AHMED, R/O- VILL- BARSARKUCHI, MOUZA- BATAHGILA, P.S. NALBARI, DIST-NALBARI, ASSAM 2: SAFIKUL ISLAM S/O- LT MASLEM ALI AHMED R/O- VILL- BARSARKUCHI MOUZA- BATAHGILA P.S. NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM 3: SABINA YASMIN D/O- LT MASLEM ALI AHMED R/O- VILL- BARSARKUCHI MOUZA- BATAHGILA P.S. NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM 4: MISS SAJINA PARBIN D/O- LT MASLEM ALI AHMED R/O- VILL- BARSARKUCHI MOUZA- BATAHGILA P.S. NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM VERSUS SIKHA BARUAH AND ORS W/O LATE BIRAJ MALLA BARUAH, R/O MILANPUR IN FRONT OF NO. 1 MASZID, P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM, GUWAHATI-21, DIST. KAMRUP M, ASSAM. Page No.# 2/4 2:RISHIRAJ BARUAH S/O LATE BIRAJ MALLA BARUAH R/O MILANPUR IN FRONT OF NO. 1 MASZID P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. 3:BIPLAB BARUAH S/O LATE BIRAJ MALLA BARUAH R/O MILANPUR IN FRONT OF NO. 1 MASZID P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. 4:DEEKSHA BARUAH S/O LATE BIRAJ MALLA BARUAH R/O MILANPUR IN FRONT OF NO. 1 MASZID P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : NURUL ALOM, MD R ISLAM,N ALOM Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S BORTHAKUR, Linked Case : RSA/242/2013 HELENA SAIKIA and 3 ORS. W/O LATE MASLEM ALI AHMED 2: MD. SAFIKUL ISLAM S/O LATE MASLEM ALI AHMED 3: MISS SABINA YASMIN D/O LATE MASLEM ALI AHMED 4: MISS SAJINA PARBIN D/O LATE MASLEM ALI AHMED Page No.# 3/4 ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL. BARSARKUCHI MOUZA BATAHGILA P.S. and DIST. NALBARI ASSAM. VERSUS BIRAJ MALLA BARUAH S/O LATE DHARMA MALLA BARUAH R/O MILANPUR IN FRONT OF NO. 1 MASZID P.O. BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MS.M DAS Advocate for : MR.B C DAS appearing for BIRAJ MALLA BARUAH BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 18.06.2026 None appears on call for the applicants. It has been brought to the notice of the Court that the notices on respondent nos. 1(A) to 1(D) was received by the respondent no. 1(A). However, due to inadvertence in paragraph no.3 of the order dated 27.05.2026, the Court had recorded service of notice only on respondent nos. 1 (A) to 1 (B), which was received by respondent no. 1(A). Therefore, the inadvertent error in the order dated 27.05.2026 requires a rectification. Accordingly, in paragraph no.3 shall now be read as if the notice on respondent nos. 1 (A) to 1(D) was received by respondent no. 1(A). Accordingly, notice is deemed to be duly served on the substituted respondent nos. 1 (A) to 1 (D). Page No.# 4/4 As per order dated 27.05.2026, the I.A’s stand disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant