N.S.Karuppasamy v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police
WP Crl.(MD)/232/2026 · 2026-01-20
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 84999 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 84999 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl (MD).No.232 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P Crl (MD).No. 232 of 2026 N.S.Karuppasamy
... Petitioner vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Ambilikai Police Station, Ambilikai, Dindigul District. 3.Krishnan
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action as against the 3rd respondent and his 20 unknown henchmen based on the petitioner's complaint dated 10.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr. M. Benazir Begum For respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *** 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl (MD).No.232 of 2026 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action as against the 3rd respondent and his 20 unknown henchmen based on the petitioner's complaint, dated
10.12.2025.
2. The petitioner himself submitted that there was a dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, and that a civil case is pending before the competent Court. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that while there is a civil dispute between the parties, the present allegation against the 3rd respondent is that the 3rd respondent, along with his 20 henchmen, illegally trespassed and damaged the petitioner’s property. Therefore, the respondents ought to inquire whether any trespass occurred and whether any damage was caused by the 3rd respondent and his 20 henchmen. The learned counsel further submitted that he is having evidence, particularly related to the damages caused to the property, and that CCTV footage is available.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent Police is 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl (MD).No.232 of 2026
directed to conduct an inquiry. If any criminal offence is made out, appropriate action will be taken.
4. With the above direction, this Writ petition is disposed of. 20.01.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes trp To
1. Secretary Home (Judicial VI), Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli -2. Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thisaiyanvilai Police Station, Thirunelveli. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl (MD).No.232 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY, J
trp
Order made in W.P Crl (MD).No. 232 of 2026 20.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis